DNV has delivered the European Maritime Safety Agency commissioned multi-year study “Safety of hydrogen for use in ships,” culminating in a final report and a non‑mandatory guidance document. The study concludes that design based safety is required for hydrogen-fuelled ships and recommends secondary enclosures across all hydrogen carrying components, including on open deck.

Hydrogen is emerging as a potential fuel option for shipping, but wider uptake is expected to take time. The study shows that hydrogen hazards differ from those of other alternative marine fuels such as LNG. Even smaller leaks can quickly form ignitable gas clouds, and combined with hydrogen’s low ignition energy and challenges associated with leak detection, this implies the need for additional onboard technical barriers to reduce explosion risks, particularly where leakage management and protection systems are concerned.

Cristina Saenz de Santa Maria, Interim CEO Maritime at DNV said: “Hydrogen has a viable path as ship fuel but carries safety risks. As new fuel technologies develop, robust safety principles must be built in from the outset. That requires new thinking, early‑stage integration, and close collaboration across the value chain, while keeping seafarer safety firmly at the center.”

Due to its high flammability and the low storage temperatures of its liquefied form, hydrogen also introduces new occupational hazards for seafarers. According to the study, this changes the conditions under which crews operate. As a result, seafarers must be trained to recognize the specific hazards related to using hydrogen as ship fuel and how to mitigate them. This should be supported by clear procedures for operation and safety management systems, with human behavior and organizational safety culture providing an additional layer of risk control.

Linda Hammer, Principal Consultant at DNV and lead author of the study said: “The study concludes that safety for hydrogen‑fuelled ships must be based on technical safety barriers, with robust containment, secondary enclosures, and automated protection systems forming the first line of defense. This reflects both the speed at which hydrogen incidents can escalate and the limitations of detection and response once a release has occurred, particularly in complex maritime environments.”

On the industry collaboration, Hammer added:
“We have valued the opportunity to deliver this study for EMSA, and the support from industry partners throughout the process and welcome the continued collaboration with both regulators and industry as the work moves forward.”