BAR Technologies is urging immediate action toward a unified global carbon framework, warning that the proliferation of regional emissions trading schemes is placing unprecedented compliance pressure on the maritime sector and risks delaying progress on decarbonisation.

With multiple overlapping schemes now in effect or emerging, including the EU ETS, FuelEU Maritime, the IMO’s postponed Net-Zero Framework, and proposed Greenhouse gas Fuel Intensity (GFI) measures, shipowners are increasingly navigating a maze of conflicting obligations. According to the International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP), over 30 emissions trading systems are now either in force or under development worldwide. This pattern of fragmentation reflects a broader global challenge: recent research from the Grantham Research Institute at the London School of Economics identified over 900 climate adaptation laws and policies adopted across 35 countries since the Paris Agreement. While this surge signals growing ambition, it also highlights the risks of uncoordinated frameworks that lead to implementation gaps, increased costs and regulatory friction across borders.

“Carbon compliance is becoming more fragmented by the month,” said John Cooper, CEO of BAR Technologies. “Instead of building momentum behind a single global framework, we’re creating a patchwork of schemes with different baselines, rules and cost mechanisms. That creates confusion, inflates costs, and weakens the industry’s ability to invest in real, scalable solutions.”

The situation is further complicated by mechanisms such as the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which went live on 1 January 2026. While not directly taxing shipping emissions, CBAM introduces indirect carbon costs into the trade system by pricing the embedded emissions of goods such as steel, aluminium, cement, and fertilisers, all of which are major seaborne cargoes.

“CBAM is an example of how carbon pricing is now embedded into trade,” Cooper noted. “But it’s also a reminder that without multilateral alignment, we risk policy friction and commercial uncertainty on a global scale.”

To avoid paralysis through bureaucracy, BAR Technologies is calling for a single carbon policy, one that is globally agreed, fairly administered and financially transparent. The company continues to advocate for a bunker-level collection mechanism to fund climate-positive reinvestment, while avoiding the duplication and complexity of overlapping schemes.

“While we await consensus on a unified framework, we cannot afford inaction,” Cooper continued. “We need technologies that work today, across regulatory zones and wind propulsion is leading that charge.”

BAR Technologies’ WindWings^®, already deployed on multiple vessels, offer immediate fuel savings and emissions reductions. Beyond near-term impact, they enhance the viability of alternative fuels like methanol and ammonia by reducing overall fuel demand.

“Wind doesn’t need permission,” said Lauren Eatwell, Head of WindWings® at BAR Technologies. “It’s scalable, proven, and will be around forever. The industry has an opportunity to act now and lead, not wait to be regulated into action.”

With carbon policy divergence increasing, BAR Technologies is encouraging the maritime industry to back deployable, fuel-agnostic solutions that reduce emissions now, while supporting the transition to a more coherent and effective global framework.