US Oil Pollution California – increased criminal penalties for oil spill related offences

Members are advised that new fines will be applicable in California from 1st January 2021 for ship sourced oil pollution damage in Californian State waters.
For Members trading to California, these legislative changes will result in:
1) A doubling of certain existing fines up to a maximum of US$1,000,000 for each violation, with each day or partial day of a violation being considered a separate violation, and
2) The courts being empowered to impose a new additional fine of up to US$1,000 per gallon of oil spilt in excess of 1,000 gallons
In each case a fine may be imposed if the violator knowingly caused, or reasonably should have known that their actions would lead to, an oil spill into Californian State waters.
Background
On 24th September 2020, the Governor of California signed Californian Assembly Bill (AB) 3214 into law and that will provide for such increased penalties and fines by means of amendments to California’s Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act (the “Act”). Under the current Act, such civil and criminal penalties can be imposed under various statutes, with Government Code §8670.3 defining liable persons (“violator”) as an individual, trust, firm, joint stock company, or corporation, including, but not limited to, a government corporation, partnership, and association, and thereby including shipowners, operators and Masters amongst other parties involved in the transportation chain.
The original draft Assembly Bill set out to:
(1) Increase the level of Californian State certification of financial responsibility (COFR) – that a tank or non-tank vessel operating in Californian waters must demonstrate in order to cover damages caused by an oil spill – from US$1 billion to US$2 billion for tank vessels and US$300 million to US$600 million for non-tank vessels,
(2) Double the existing level of certain criminal fines that shall be imposed in the event of an oil spill, and
(3) Empower the courts to impose an additional criminal fine of up to US$10,000 per gallon of oil spilt.
In each case, the liability would be determined on the basis that the violator knowingly caused, or reasonably should have known that their actions would lead to, an oil spill in Californian State waters. Under California law, the phrase, “reasonably should have known,” has been equated with a simple negligence standard.
Members will be aware that the International Group Clubs do not issue the Federal or State COFRs that tank and non-tank vessels are required to obtain in order to trade to the US, but that the IG Clubs provide cover for oil pollution damage of up to US$1 billion per ship per incident (and which covers third party claims as well as fines where they fall under the Club Rules) that is needed in order to obtain a COFR.
AB 3214 – Californian legislature
Following direct representations from the International Group and local shipowner and energy organisations to the Bill sponsor, the proposed COFR increases were removed from the draft Bill. The Bill sponsor also reduced the potential per gallon fine from up to US$10,000 per gallon down to a maximum of US$1,000 per gallon in excess of 1,000 gallons spilt, however it was not possible to remove this from the legislation in its entirety or reduce it further. The Bill sponsor also retained the doubling of existing criminal fines.
Governor of California – signature of AB 3214
The International Group, in co-operation with the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), subsequently made direct representation to the Governor of California to veto AB 3214. The International Group and the ICS also engaged local interests and sought to engage maritime labour unions to make similar representations given the implications for a wide number of parties both domestically in California and internationally.
Unfortunately, the Governor did not exercise his right to veto and signed the legislation into law on 24th September with an effective date of 1st January 2021.
The increased/new criminal fines under the Act may be imposed where the violator:
(1) Knowingly fails to follow the direction or orders of the administrator in connection with an oil spill.
(2) Knowingly fails to notify the Coast Guard that a vessel is disabled within one hour of the disability and the vessel, while disabled, causes a discharge of oil that enters marine waters.
(3) Knowingly engages in or causes the discharge or spill of oil into waters of the state, or a person who reasonably should have known that he or she was engaging in or causing the discharge or spill of oil into waters of the state.
(4) Knowingly fails to begin clean-up, abatement, or removal of spilt oil as required.
A person convicted of violating any of the above prohibited acts shall be subjected to a fine of not less than US$10,000 and not more than US$1,000,000 for each violation with each day or partial day of a violation being considered a separate violation. (Members should note, as mentioned above, that there are various existing civil and criminal fines which may be imposed in addition to those that are the subject of this circular).
The legislation further provides that “the court may also impose upon a person convicted of violating subdivision (a) (i.e. paragraphs 1 through 4 above), a fine of up to one thousand dollars (US$1,000) per gallon spilt in excess of 1,000 gallons of oil.” .
In relation to paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 above, these fines may only apply where conduct is intentional. However, paragraph 3 refers not only to knowing conduct, but also to ‘…a person who should have reasonably known…’ such that under California law a shipowner might be exposed to fines for violation of this provision even in the event of simple negligence on their part.
The International Group Clubs are considering the potential impact of this new legislation on cover for pollution risks, having in mind the potential for very substantial fines to be issued against a polluter and will advise Members further in that regard.
The International Group and the ICS will also consider the possibility of taking steps to address industry’s concerns arising from this new law, although any such steps will not affect its entry into force date in California on 1st January 2021.
Source: North P&I
Related News.
September 25, 2026
ISLAND OIL: Unveiling of the Sculpture “Cyprus’s Journey Through the Ages” in Protaras – A Tribute and Landmark to Cyprus’s Historical Memory and Cultural Heritage
In a modest ceremony marked by a moving atmosphere, the sculpture “Cyprus’s Journey Through the Ages”, created by acclaimed Cypriot sculptor…
September 25, 2026
World Maritime Day 2026 from Policy to Practice – powering Maritime Excellence
Global regulations will deliver safer, more resilient shipping when they are implemented worldwide. The international maritime community marks…
September 25, 2026
Diana Shipping announces Time Charter Contract for m/v DSI Polaris with Dai An Ocean Shipping
Diana Shipping , a global shipping company specializing in the ownership and bareboat charter-in of dry bulk vessels, announced that, through a…
September 25, 2026
Chief Economists Expect Global Economy to Stabilize, but Fiscal Constraints, Rising Living Costs and AI Investment Uncertainty Threaten Growth
The global economy is stabilizing, but the fiscal support that cushioned successive shocks since 2020 is unlikely to play the same role in the year…
September 25, 2026
V. welcomes its new graduate cohort as programme expands across the group
Twelve graduates from nine nationalities join 11th year of V.’s expanded international management programme. V., the global ship manager and marine…
September 25, 2026
From Policy to Practice: Why Seafarers Are the Key to Maritime Excellence
The shipping industry is no stranger to regulation. Seafarers and ship operators work within a vast framework of international conventions, national…
September 25, 2026
Intermodal Report – Week 38 2026
Please find below the Intermodal market report for week 38 2026. Intermodal Report Week 38 2026 Market Insight By Nikos Tagoulis, Head of…
September 25, 2026
Allied – Weekly Market Review – Week 38
Please find below the Allied Weekly Report for Week 38 | 2026 ALLIED - Weekly Market Report- Week 38
September 25, 2026
Record year on the Northeast Passage but Arctic shipping remains very limited
In 2025, a record 103 transit voyages were made via the Northeast Passage. However, this is still equivalent to only around a day and a half of…
September 25, 2026
[xclusiv] S&P Report 21th September 2026
Please find below the [xclusiv] latest Weekly S&P Report [xclusiv] 2026_09_21 Market Commentary: VLCCs: Freight Boom Reprices the Fleet The VLCC…
Subscribe to our newsletter!
if you dont want to swim alone in the ocean of news, sign up for the newsletter, and you will receive daily all the important news of world shipping!
Design & Development by P.KAN.DESIGNER
© 2026 Cyprus Shipping News. All rights reserved
Design & Development by P.KAN.DESIGNER
© 2026 Cyprus Shipping News. All rights reserved























